I’ve been slow to write this week because I’m pulling double duty at the office, filling in for the administrative assistant, Jean, while she is away on vacation. Jean is phenomenal at what she does—she is the world’s most prepared worker and can coordinate more details than are contained in the average human genome. So naturally, there’s a good possibility that while I’m stepping in for her two things could happen: (1) I will get fired (2) the church operation will come to a screeching halt.
The past several weeks I’ve been in contact with a number of seminary professors, one of which comes to teach adult Church School each Sunday morning. My job is simply to coordinate their visits and lectures.
I spent the week advertising the lecture for this Sunday’s guest professor, who has a senior position at a seminary nearby and has studied around the world. By the end of the week I had gotten the word out in the bulletin, newsletter, website, and Facebook. Moreover, I contacted the professor one last time to confirm all details. Job well done, I thought.
But alas on Friday morning I receive a subtle reply: “I’m sorry, there must be an misunderstanding. Based on our previous correspondence I took the speaking engagement to be cancelled. Have a nice day.”
I frantically looked back at our “previous correspondence.” A couple weeks before I had asked the scholar to switch Sunday mornings with another professor (at the request of the latter), and he replied with a polite “no thanks.” Although I thought I was clear that he did NOT have to switch—that he would be welcome to teach on whichever Sunday he chose—apparently I was not.
He read the email differently, cancelled, and made other plans.
I am constantly struck by the importance of perspective, of interpretation. We interpret every one of our encounters, conversations, and readings, and these interpretations are sculpted by our own stories and experiences. Our backgrounds, upbringings, roles, interests, families, and goals have a profound impact on how we absorb and understand the world around us.
The essential step toward empathy—toward the Golden Rule—is to recognize that all people do not come from the same starting line. So many love to argue that all people can be characterized in the same way and that the needs and desires of one peoples are identical for all peoples. There is a natural tendency for us to look in the mirror and assume that everyone should look the same. There’s perhaps a more natural tendency to look in the mirror and assume that everyone actually is the same.
But who are we kidding? Undoubtedly we all have similar physical and emotional needs; but to suggest that we all start from the same Point A and need/want to progress to the same Point B in the same way is only a hindrance to the unity and cooperation needed to navigate a society of growth, peace, and understanding.
As frustrating as our plurality of perspectives can be (trust me, I read our “previous correspondence” about 6 times), I hope we take heed to song that rings “we’re one, but we’re not the same.” Particularly as Christians: instead of spending time in our pews embracing ourselves, may we have the courage to embrace the differences of others, empathize with those from diverse walks, and learn from foreign experiences.
Strangely, many of our faiths seem opposed to the idea. I would suggest that our faith depends on it.